The recent pivot by platform X, once known as Twitter, to introduce user charges for core features in the Philippines and New Zealand, is a watershed moment. Intended to be a strategy to combat bots and spam, this move is emblematic of broader shifts in the digital space. The proliferation of bots and spam accounts, clouding genuine interactions and magnifying misinformation, is an urgent concern. X’s “Not a Bot” subscription aims to ensure the authenticity of its user base, thereby elevating the overall platform experience. By introducing a fee, the theory is that potential abusers might reconsider the cost-benefit of spawning deceptive accounts.
However, it’s also an assertion that quality digital spaces might warrant. In short, by making users pay, X also makes as an advertising-driven revenue model).
For many Filipinos, an additional cost, no matter how minimal it might seem to some, can be a significant strain, especially for platforms or services they used to access for free. This shift poses a broader societal question: As we move toward an increasingly digital world, are we inadvertently setting up barriers, making essential digital services a privilege rather than a right?
The broader media ecosystem in the Philippines also faces potential upheaval. Media companies, social media content creators, and even brands have deeply embedded themselves in the digital realm, leveraging its expansive reach and accessibility. The democratization of information, one of the triumphs of the digital age, is predicated on platforms like X being universally accessible. With charging gates, we may be rolling back the clock, placing information once again in the hands of a select few.
Historically, events like theCambridge Analytica scandal in 2019 are somber reminders of the vulnerabilities inherent in digital platforms. Marrying financial transactions with user data introduces a new layer of complexity. Without transparent data usage policies, platforms risk further estranging users already wary of past breaches.
Yet, amid these challenges lie significant opportunities. A transition to a paid platform model could transform the landscape of user data security. When users contribute financially, there is an implicit expectation for enhanced accountability regarding data protection. Such financial stakes heighten the obligation for platforms to elevate their data security measures substantially.
Take, for example,the initiative by Meta, which has introduced a paid subscription option that eliminates ads, offering users a more private experience. This model does more than just remove ads—it signals a shift towards a framework where user privacy is not just an option but a prioritized commodity. By aligning financial incentives with privacy concerns, platforms can forge a more secure environment that caters to the growing demand for digital privacy.
A paid model may also set the stage for improved customer service, fostering a more direct relationship between the user and the platform. With a revenue model less dependent on advertising, platforms that adopt a subscription-based approach could, in theory, be more responsive and attentive to user feedback and concerns. They must be, as paying customers will likely have higher expectations for service quality and responsiveness.
Furthermore, this shift could catalyze a more sustainable model for social media platforms, where the value is placed on the quality of the user experience and content integrity rather than on the volume of data that can be harvested for advertising purposes. This is a pivotal moment for social media companies, in the Philippines and beyond, to reevaluate their role and potential as stewards of a digital ecosystem that not only connects people but also protects their right to privacy.
However, this doesn’t negate potential pitfalls. Introducing a fee, even as nominal as $1, might seem a deterrent for individual users, but it does not guarantee the elimination of bot farms. In reality, well-funded large-scale entities utilizing automated accounts will have no problem investing this amount if it advances their agenda.
It’s also essential to recognize the landscape of the current digital space. Echo chambers already permeate social media platforms, as it is. A subscription model could unintentionally exacerbate this. If only specific socioeconomic groups can afford to access certain venues, we risk creating even more insulated digital communities. This could lead to even narrower perspectives, further homogenizing viewpoints and diminishing diversity of thought.
Furthermore, there is the looming threat of alternative ‘free’ platforms emerging in response to these paid models. While these might attract users displaced by subscription fees, they could be less regulated or less committed to curbing misinformation. This scenario might result in more fragmented digital spaces, where unchecked narratives and potentially harmful content proliferate.
Monetization might also affect the intrinsic nature of interactions on social media in the Philippines, which many consider a platform for freedom of speech. More contrived exchanges could replace spontaneous sharing and organic engagements, as users need help maximizing their return on payment. In weighing these outcomes, it is crucial to remember that social media isn’t just a platform; for many, it’s an extension of their lives, their identities. The Philippines, with its unique blend of culture, economic realities, and social media enthusiasm, presents a particularly complex canvas. Any decision regarding monetization should be approached with sensitivity, foresight, and a commitment to preserving the inclusivity and vibrancy of the digital realm. As we stand on the precipice of this potential shift, rather than just aiming to preserve the status quo, the goal should be to envision a future where platforms evolve into positive social drivers, championing the safety of users and the sanctity of truth.
For us, as social media users, the pressing question reaches far beyond the realm of monetization. It’s about revolutionizing and enhancing the essence of our social media platforms — transforming them into hubs of not just interpersonal connections but also reliable sources of information. We stand at the crossroads, where we must steer these platforms toward becoming catalysts for genuine connections, fostering an environment where knowledge is shared accurately, and contributing to our collective enlightenment and growth. As participants in this digital ecosystem, it’s a collective responsibility to champion a future for social media that isn’t just about the number of our connections, but the quality and veracity of the information that flows between them.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Carla Moreno currently serves as Corporate Communications Director of Vero in the Philippines and ASEAN, leading campaigns for industry-leading brands and international NGOs such as the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet.
In early 2017, Vero conducted a comprehensive study focused on Yangon millennials. This white paper aims at introducing key insights with the hope that it will help you build coherent communication tactics in beautiful Myanmar, and perhaps one day, serve as an introduction to fruitful conversations.
Many people in Myanmar are now living every moment with heavy hearts and justified anxiety. It is a somber time in what is normally a vibrant country, with the possibility of escalation a constant source of dread.